Effect of Somatostatin on hepatic blood flow: preliminary results

Keywords:

Somatostatin, liver circulation, hepatic blood flow


Published online: Dec 21 2023

https://doi.org/10.56126/74.4.28

H. Thierens1, J. Van Limmen1, P .Wyffels1, F. Berrevoet2, l. De Baerdemaeker1, S. De Hert1

1 Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital Gent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent
2 Department of General Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Gent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent

Abstract

Background: Somatostatin (SOMATO) administration affects hepatic blood flow (HBF); however, its clinical effect remains ill-defined. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical effects of SOMATO administration on HBF during major abdominal surgery by comparing HBF in patients with and without intra-operative SOMATO admin-istration.

Methods: This retrospective analysis used data from two separate prospective studies including patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy and was approved by the Ghent University Hospital ethical committee. All patients received total intravenous an-esthesia, using target-controlled infusion, and guided by a depth of anesthesia monitor. Schnider model was used for propofol, and Minto model was used for remifentanil. All patients received goal-directed hemodynamic therapy guided and recorded by Pul-sioFlex monitoring (Getinge Group). Portal vein blood flow and arterial hepatic blood flow were measured using ultrasound transit time flow measurements (Medi-Stim®). Both PVF and HAF were indexed using cardiac index. Patients were divided in two groups, receiving SOMATO (group S) versus control group not receiving SOMATO (group C). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used for testing normal distribution. Statistical testing was done using a Welch T-test or a Wilcoxon test.

Results: From 6/2017 to 10/2020, a total of thirty-seven patients were analyzed. Twenty-five patients received SOMATO (group S) whereas twelve patients did not (group C). In Group S, PVFi was significantly reduced in patients receiving SOMATO compared to the control group (p = 0.005). HAFi was similar in both groups. The net effect on total HBFi was significantly lower in group S (p = 0.027). Hemodynamic parameters did not differ between both groups.

Conclusions: SOMATO significantly reduced PVFi in the surgical patients while HAFi remained similar in both groups. As a result, total HBFi was significantly lower in SO-MATO-treated patients.